CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi e-tron GT vs Mercedes-Benz EQS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi e-tron GT vs Mercedes-Benz EQS

Two electric Sedans go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$209,900$209,900
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)559km708km
Battery105 kWh107.8 kWh
Power500kW245kW
0-100 km/h3.4s6.2s
Max DC Charge320kW200kW
10-80% Charge Time18 min31 min
Boot Space405L610L
Towing1,000kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Audi e-tron GT & Mercedes-Benz EQS

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi e-tron GT starts from $209,900 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz EQS opens at $209,900. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $230,890 and $230,890 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

97kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 33m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 320kW · 0–80%

18 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (22kW AC, 320kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

108.4kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 44m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 200kW · 0–80%

33 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 200kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Audi e-tron GT features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz EQS gets a 12.8-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi e-tron GT stands out with Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz EQS. The Mercedes-Benz EQS counters with wireless charging, panoramic roof and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi e-tron GT gets leather upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz EQS offers nappa leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Audi e-tron GT and 4-zone in the Mercedes-Benz EQS.

Drivetrain

The Audi e-tron GT uses a Electric producing 500kW and 717Nm of torque, sent through a single speed to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.4 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz EQS responds with a Electric making 245kW and 568Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.2 seconds.

The Audi e-tron GT has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 245kW. In the real-world sprint, the Audi e-tron GT is 2.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 105kWh (Audi e-tron GT) vs 107.8kWh (Mercedes-Benz EQS), giving WLTP ranges of 559km and 708km. DC fast charging peaks at 320kW (Audi e-tron GT) vs 200kW (Mercedes-Benz EQS).

Space & Comfort

The Audi e-tron GT measures 4,989mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 227mm shorter than the Mercedes-Benz EQS at 5,216mm (3,210mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz EQS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 405L in the Audi e-tron GT and 610L in the Mercedes-Benz EQS, giving the Mercedes-Benz EQS a 205L advantage.

For towing, the Mercedes-Benz EQS leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 12.4m

TightestAudi e-tron GT S e-tron GTTightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Audi e-tron GT S e-tron GT
11.6mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz EQS EQS450+
12.4m
Worst
Audi e-tron GT S e-tron GT
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mercedes-Benz EQS EQS450+
12.4m · Large

Based on 12.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAudi e-tron GTTightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Audi e-tron GTTightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Mercedes-Benz EQS12.4 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi e-tron GT) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz EQS). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi e-tron GT if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz EQS if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Audi e-tron GT and Mercedes-Benz EQS trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz EQS has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi e-tron GT and Mercedes-Benz EQS?

The Audi e-tron GT is the cheapest at $209,900 before on-road costs.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS has the most range at 780km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Audi e-tron GT accepts the highest DC charging at up to 320kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz EQS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS has the largest boot at 610L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Audi e-tron GT makes the most power at 500kW. The Audi e-tron GT is quickest to 100km/h in 3.4s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best electric cars