CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi e-tron GT vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi e-tron GT vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$209,900$76,900
Range (WLTP)559km
Battery105 kWh
Power435kW150kW
0-100 km/h3.4s7.8s
Max DC Charge320kW
10-80% Charge Time18 min
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km
Boot Space405L455L
Towing1,000kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Audi e-tron GT starts from $209,900 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz C-Class opens at $76,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz C-Class the more affordable entry point by $133,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $230,890 and $84,590 respectively.

The Audi e-tron GT qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mercedes-Benz C-Class, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Audi e-tron GT and Mercedes-Benz C-Class hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Audi e-tron GT and 91% for the Mercedes-Benz C-Class.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Audi e-tron GT packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mercedes-Benz C-Class.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Audi e-tron GT and 9 in the Mercedes-Benz C-Class. The Audi e-tron GT adds a 360-degree camera that the Mercedes-Benz C-Class misses.

Feature Showdown

The Audi e-tron GT features a 10.1-inch touchscreen, while the Mercedes-Benz C-Class gets a 11.9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi e-tron GT stands out with heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz C-Class. The Mercedes-Benz C-Class counters with wireless charging and panoramic roof. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Audi e-tron GT uses a Electric producing 435kW and 740Nm of torque, sent through a single speed to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.4 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz C-Class responds with a Petrol making 150kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The Audi e-tron GT has the clear power advantage at 435kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Audi e-tron GT is 4.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi e-tron GT measures 4,989mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 238mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz C-Class at 4,751mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Audi e-tron GT generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 405L in the Audi e-tron GT and 455L in the Mercedes-Benz C-Class, giving the Mercedes-Benz C-Class a 50L advantage.

For towing, the Mercedes-Benz C-Class leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.6m

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C200
11.1mTighter
Best
Audi e-tron GT S e-tron GT
11.6m
Worst
Audi e-tron GT
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mercedes-Benz C-Class
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi e-tron GT) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz C-Class). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi e-tron GT if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz C-Class if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Audi e-tron GT and Mercedes-Benz C-Class trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz C-Class has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans