CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda 6 vs Skoda Scala
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda 6 vs Skoda Scala

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaSkoda
Price (RRP)$29,740$30,900
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power125kW85kW
0-100 km/h10.1s
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space519L467L
Towing1,500kg1,200kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mazda 6 & Skoda Scala

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda 6 starts from $29,740 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Scala opens at $30,900. That makes the Mazda 6 the more affordable entry point by $1,160.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,714 and $33,990 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Scala by roughly $4,275 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Skoda Scala counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that the Mazda 6 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda 6 uses a 2.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT producing 125kW and 226Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual / 5-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Skoda Scala responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Mazda 6 has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 85kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda 6 measures 4,735mm long on a 2,725mm wheelbase, 373mm longer than the Skoda Scala at 4,362mm (2,649mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda 6 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 519L in the Mazda 6 and 467L in the Skoda Scala, giving the Mazda 6 a 52L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda 6 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 11.0m

TightestSkoda Scala 85TSI SelectTightest turn at 10.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Scala 85TSI Select
10.2mTighter
Best
Mazda 6 Limited
11.0m
Worst
Mazda 6 Limited
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Scala 85TSI Select
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda ScalaTightest turn at 10.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda 611.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Skoda ScalaTightest10.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda 6 and $1,539/year for the Skoda Scala. That is a $855 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Scala.

Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda 6) vs $1,539 (Skoda Scala). The Skoda Scala saves you roughly $855 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years (Mazda 6) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Scala). The Skoda Scala has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda 6 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Scala if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda 6 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Scala will save you roughly $855 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda 6 has a clear edge. The Skoda Scala adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda 6 and Skoda Scala?

The Mazda 6 is the cheapest at $29,740 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Scala by $1,160.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Scala uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda 6 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda 6 has the largest boot at 519L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda 6 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Scala has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda 6 makes the most power at 125kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars