Mazda 6e vs Volvo XC40
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Mazda 6e
From $49,990
Hatchback
Electric
Electric Motor
190kW
—
ANCAP: no data
337L
Volvo XC40
From $54,990
SUV
Petrol
2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid
145kW
7.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
460L
Track the Mazda 6e & Volvo XC40
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda 6e starts from $49,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC40 opens at $54,990. That makes the Mazda 6e the more affordable entry point by $5,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,989 and $60,489 respectively.
The Mazda 6e qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Volvo XC40, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
78kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 194kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 194kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda 6e features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC40 gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda 6e stands out with V2L and Sony audio that you will not find on the Volvo XC40. The Volvo XC40 counters with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda 6e uses a Electric Motor producing 190kW and 290Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.
The Volvo XC40 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid making 145kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.
The Mazda 6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 145kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda 6e measures 4,921mm long on a 2,895mm wheelbase, 481mm longer than the Volvo XC40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda 6e generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 337L in the Mazda 6e and 460L in the Volvo XC40, giving the Volvo XC40 a 123L advantage.
For towing, the Volvo XC40 leads with a 2,100kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.2m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda 6e) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda 6e if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda 6e takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC40 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda 6e and Volvo XC40?
The Mazda 6e is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo XC40 by $5,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volvo XC40 uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Mazda 6e and Volvo XC40 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volvo XC40 has the largest boot at 460L.
Which can tow the most?
The Volvo XC40 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,100kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda 6e makes the most power at 190kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
