CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-5 vs Jaecoo J7
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-5 vs Jaecoo J7

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaJaecoo
Price (RRP)$39,990$37,990
Power132kW130kW
0-100 km/h8.7s9.5s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km7.8 L/100km
Boot Space522L431L
Towing2,000kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km8yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-5 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Jaecoo J7 opens at $37,990. That makes the Jaecoo J7 the more affordable entry point by $2,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $41,789 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-5 and Jaecoo J7 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 95% for the Mazda CX-5 and 81% for the Jaecoo J7.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Jaecoo J7 packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-5.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-5 and 8 in the Jaecoo J7.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-5 features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Jaecoo J7 gets a 13.2-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Jaecoo J7 counters with power tailgate, SONY audio and ambient lighting that the Mazda CX-5 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-5 uses a Petrol producing 132kW and 242Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.

The Jaecoo J7 responds with a Petrol making 130kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-5 has the clear power advantage at 132kW vs 130kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-5 is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4,575mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 75mm longer than the Jaecoo J7 at 4,500mm (2,672mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 522L in the Mazda CX-5 and 431L in the Jaecoo J7, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 91L advantage.

For towing, the Jaecoo J7 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.0mTighter
Best
Jaecoo J7 Track 2WD
11.2m
Worst
Mazda CX-5
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Jaecoo J7
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5 and $2,223/year for the Jaecoo J7. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-5.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Mazda CX-5) vs $2,223 (Jaecoo J7). The Mazda CX-5 saves you roughly $114 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5) vs 8 years / 999,999km (Jaecoo J7). The Jaecoo J7 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Jaecoo J7 if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer Jaecoo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-5 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-5 will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-5 has a clear edge. The Jaecoo J7 adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-5 and Jaecoo J7?

The Jaecoo J7 is the cheapest at $37,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-5 by $2,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-5 uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-5 and Jaecoo J7 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-5 has the largest boot at 522L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Jaecoo J7 has the longest warranty at 8 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-5 makes the most power at 132kW. The Mazda CX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs