Mazda CX-60 vs Mitsubishi Outlander
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-60 starts from $44,240 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Outlander opens at $39,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander the more affordable entry point by $4,250.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,664 and $43,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-60 and Mitsubishi Outlander hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Mazda CX-60 and 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-60 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-60 and 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-60 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Outlander gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mitsubishi Outlander counters with Yamaha audio that the Mazda CX-60 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-60 uses a Petrol producing 138kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Outlander responds with a Petrol making 135kW and 244Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.
The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 135kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-60 measures 4,745mm long on a 2,870mm wheelbase, 35mm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander at 4,710mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 570L in the Mazda CX-60 and 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 92L advantage.
For towing, the Mitsubishi Outlander leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.4m
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60 and $2,081/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Estimated annual total: $2,138 (Mazda CX-60) vs $2,081 (Mitsubishi Outlander). The Mitsubishi Outlander saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander). The Mitsubishi Outlander has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Mazda CX-60 and Mitsubishi Outlander trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mitsubishi Outlander will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-60 and Mitsubishi Outlander?
The Mitsubishi Outlander is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-60 by $4,250.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Outlander uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-60 and Mitsubishi Outlander all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Outlander has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-60 makes the most power at 138kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
