CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda Mazda3 vs Mitsubishi Colt
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda Mazda3 vs Mitsubishi Colt

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Mitsubishi Colt: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$26,490TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power114kW77kW
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space295L317L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / 130k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Mazda Mazda3 & Mitsubishi Colt

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda Mazda3 stands out with Apple CarPlay and head-up display — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi Colt. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda Mazda3 gets black cloth upholstery while the Mitsubishi Colt offers cloth (sports bucket seats).

Drivetrain

The Mazda Mazda3 uses a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol with i-stop and cylinder deactivation producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic (skyactiv-drive) to a FWD layout.

The Mitsubishi Colt responds with a Petrol making 77kW and 141Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The Mazda Mazda3 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 77kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda Mazda3 measures 4,460mm long on a 2,725mm wheelbase, 560mm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt at 3,900mm (2,500mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 295L in the Mazda Mazda3 and 317L in the Mitsubishi Colt, giving the Mitsubishi Colt a 22L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.6m

TightestMitsubishi Colt VRX ManualTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Colt VRX Manual
9.8mTighter
Best
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Worst
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Colt VRX Manual
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi ColtTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda Mazda310.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Mitsubishi ColtTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3 and $1,682/year for the Mitsubishi Colt.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3) vs 5 years / 130,000km (Mitsubishi Colt). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Colt if: You need more boot space, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda Mazda3 and Mitsubishi Colt trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda3 and Mitsubishi Colt?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda3 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mazda Mazda3 and Mitsubishi Colt carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Colt has the largest boot at 317L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda Mazda3 makes the most power at 114kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars