CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda MX-5 vs Volkswagen Eos
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda MX-5 vs Volkswagen Eos

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Convertibles compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Mazda MX-5: we're still completing seat count, 0-100km/h and braked towing.

Volkswagen Eos: we're still completing price, kerb weight and ground clearance.

Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$31,990TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power96kW155kW
0-100 km/h7.8s
Fuel Economy6.1 L/100km7.7 L/100km
Boot Space130L205L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars4 Stars

Track the Mazda MX-5 & Volkswagen Eos

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

The Mazda MX-5 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Volkswagen Eos.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 0 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Volkswagen Eos counters with heated front seats that the Mazda MX-5 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda MX-5 uses a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol (SKYACTIV-G) producing 96kW and 150Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual (skyactiv-mt) to a RWD layout.

The Volkswagen Eos responds with a 2.0 TSI turbo-petrol direct injection making 155kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed dsg driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The Volkswagen Eos has the clear power advantage at 155kW vs 96kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda MX-5 measures 3,915mm long on a 2,310mm wheelbase, 492mm shorter than the Volkswagen Eos at 4,407mm (2,576mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen Eos generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 130L in the Mazda MX-5 and 205L in the Volkswagen Eos, giving the Volkswagen Eos a 75L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 10.9m

TightestMazda MX-5 ND 1.5L Roadster ManualTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda MX-5 ND 1.5L Roadster Manual
9.4mTighter
Best
Volkswagen Eos 155TSI
10.9m
Worst
Mazda MX-5 ND 1.5L Roadster Manual
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Eos 155TSI
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda MX-5Tightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda MX-5Tightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Volkswagen Eos10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,739/year for the Mazda MX-5 and $2,195/year for the Volkswagen Eos. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Mazda MX-5.

Estimated annual total: $1,739 (Mazda MX-5) vs $2,195 (Volkswagen Eos). The Mazda MX-5 saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years (Mazda MX-5) vs 3 years (Volkswagen Eos). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda MX-5 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Eos if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda MX-5 and Volkswagen Eos trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda MX-5 will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Eos has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda MX-5 and Volkswagen Eos?

The Mazda MX-5 is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda MX-5 uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Mazda MX-5 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen Eos has the largest boot at 205L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volkswagen Eos has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen Eos makes the most power at 155kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · Best family cars