CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW Z4 vs Volkswagen Eos
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW Z4 vs Volkswagen Eos

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Convertibles compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Volkswagen Eos: we're still completing price, kerb weight and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBMWVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$99,200TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power145kW155kW
0-100 km/h6.6s7.8s
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km7.7 L/100km
Boot Space281L205L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data4 Stars

Track the BMW Z4 & Volkswagen Eos

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW Z4 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Volkswagen Eos. The Volkswagen Eos counters with heated front seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BMW Z4 uses a Petrol producing 145kW and 320Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.6 seconds.

The Volkswagen Eos responds with a 2.0 TSI turbo-petrol direct injection making 155kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed dsg driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The Volkswagen Eos has the clear power advantage at 155kW vs 145kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW Z4 is 1.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW Z4 measures 4,324mm long on a 2,470mm wheelbase, 83mm shorter than the Volkswagen Eos at 4,407mm (2,576mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volkswagen Eos generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 281L in the BMW Z4 and 205L in the Volkswagen Eos, giving the BMW Z4 a 76L advantage. The Volkswagen Eos seats 4 vs 2.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.9m to 11.0m

TightestVolkswagen Eos 155TSITightest turn at 10.9m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volkswagen Eos 155TSI
10.9mTighter
Best
BMW Z4 sDrive20i
11.0m
Worst
BMW Z4 sDrive20i
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen Eos 155TSI
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolkswagen EosTightest turn at 10.9m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW Z411.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Volkswagen EosTightest10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the BMW Z4 and $2,195/year for the Volkswagen Eos. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the BMW Z4.

Estimated annual total: $1,853 (BMW Z4) vs $2,195 (Volkswagen Eos). The BMW Z4 saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW Z4) vs 3 years (Volkswagen Eos). The BMW Z4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW Z4 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Eos if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW Z4 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The BMW Z4 will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW Z4 has a clear edge. The BMW Z4 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW Z4 and Volkswagen Eos?

The BMW Z4 is the cheapest at $99,200 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW Z4 uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Volkswagen Eos all hold a 4-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW Z4 has the largest boot at 281L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volkswagen Eos has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW Z4 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volkswagen Eos makes the most power at 155kW. The BMW Z4 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.6s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · Best family cars