CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz EQA vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Ford Mustang Mach-E

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzFord
Price (RRP)$79,900$86,990
Range (WLTP)480km540km
Battery66.5 kWh91 kWh
Power140kW198kW
0-100 km/h8.6s7s
Max DC Charge100kW150kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min28 min
Boot Space340L402L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz EQA starts from $79,900 before on-road costs, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E opens at $86,990. That makes the Mercedes-Benz EQA the more affordable entry point by $7,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $87,890 and $95,689 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Ford Mustang Mach-E hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 97% for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 92% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mercedes-Benz EQA packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

Both include the essentials: lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Ford Mustang Mach-E adds a 360-degree camera that the Mercedes-Benz EQA misses.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mercedes-Benz EQA stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The Ford Mustang Mach-E counters with head-up display, heated front seats and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz EQA uses a Electric producing 140kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E responds with a Electric Motor making 198kW and 580Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the clear power advantage at 198kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 66.5kWh (Mercedes-Benz EQA) vs 91kWh (Ford Mustang Mach-E), giving WLTP ranges of 480km and 540km. DC fast charging peaks at 100kW (Mercedes-Benz EQA) vs 150kW (Ford Mustang Mach-E).

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz EQA measures 4,463mm long on a 2,729mm wheelbase, 250mm shorter than the Ford Mustang Mach-E at 4,713mm (2,984mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang Mach-E generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 340L in the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E, giving the Ford Mustang Mach-E a 62L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m diameter

Good

Mercedes-Benz EQA EQA250
11.0m
Mercedes-Benz EQA
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz EQA) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz EQA if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Mustang Mach-E takes 7 of 8 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz EQA and Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Mercedes-Benz EQA is the cheapest at $79,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Mustang Mach-E by $7,090.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the most range at 540km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts the highest DC charging at up to 150kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz EQA and Ford Mustang Mach-E all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the largest boot at 402L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz EQA has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E makes the most power at 198kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs