CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes-Benz EQB
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes-Benz EQB

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)$80,490$84,900
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)540km465km
Battery91 kWh70.5 kWh
Power212kW140kW
0-100 km/h7s8.9s
Max DC Charge150kW100kW
10-80% Charge Time28 min32 min
Boot Space402L495L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Ford Mustang Mach-E & Mercedes-Benz EQB

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford Mustang Mach-E starts from $80,490 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz EQB opens at $84,900. That makes the Ford Mustang Mach-E the more affordable entry point by $4,410.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $88,539 and $93,390 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Mercedes-Benz EQB hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 95% for the Mercedes-Benz EQB.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mercedes-Benz EQB packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Ford Mustang Mach-E adds a 360-degree camera that the Mercedes-Benz EQB misses.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

88kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 24m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 150kW · 0–80%

35 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 150kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

66.5kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 4m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 100kW · 0–80%

40 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 100kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Mustang Mach-E features a 15.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz EQB gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands out with head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Bang & Olufsen audio that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz EQB. The Mercedes-Benz EQB counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses a Electric Motor producing 212kW and 525Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz EQB responds with a Electric making 140kW and 385Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.9 seconds.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the clear power advantage at 212kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 91kWh (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 70.5kWh (Mercedes-Benz EQB), giving WLTP ranges of 540km and 465km. DC fast charging peaks at 150kW (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 100kW (Mercedes-Benz EQB).

Space & Comfort

The Ford Mustang Mach-E measures 4,713mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 29mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz EQB at 4,684mm (2,829mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Mustang Mach-E generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 402L in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 495L in the Mercedes-Benz EQB, giving the Mercedes-Benz EQB a 93L advantage. The Mercedes-Benz EQB seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m diameter

Average

Mercedes-Benz EQB EQB250
11.4m
Mercedes-Benz EQB EQB250
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Mercedes-Benz EQB Turning circle · Ø 11.4 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.0 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Mustang Mach-E) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz EQB). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Mustang Mach-E if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz EQB if: You need more boot space, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Mustang Mach-E takes 7 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mercedes-Benz EQB has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Mustang Mach-E and Mercedes-Benz EQB?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the cheapest at $80,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz EQB by $4,410.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the most range at 600km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts the highest DC charging at up to 150kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Mustang Mach-E and Mercedes-Benz EQB all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mercedes-Benz EQB has the largest boot at 495L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mercedes-Benz EQB has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E makes the most power at 212kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs