CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG MG ZS vs Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG MG ZS vs Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGChery
Price (RRP)$22,990$29,990
Power81kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.9s10.5s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space359L358L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MG MG ZS starts from $22,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid opens at $29,990. That makes the MG MG ZS the more affordable entry point by $7,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $25,289 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by roughly $1,855 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG MG ZS and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the MG MG ZS and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG MG ZS packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the MG MG ZS and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Feature Showdown

The MG MG ZS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG MG ZS stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG MG ZS uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 140Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid responds with a Hybrid making 150kW and 310Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 81kW. In the real-world sprint, the MG MG ZS is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG MG ZS measures 4,430mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 100mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid at 4,330mm (2,604mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG MG ZS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 359L in the MG MG ZS and 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid, giving the MG MG ZS a 1L advantage.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6mTighter
Best
MG MG ZS Vibe
11.0m
Worst
MG MG ZS
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the MG MG ZS and $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid. That is a $371 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (MG MG ZS) vs $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $371 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG MG ZS) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). The MG MG ZS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG MG ZS if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG MG ZS takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $371 a year in fuel. The MG MG ZS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs