CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Hyundai Kona
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Hyundai Kona

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryHyundai
Price (RRP)$27,500$32,500
Power71kW110kW
0-100 km/h10.5s9.9s
Fuel Economy5.4 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space358L361L
Towing1,500kg1,300kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai Kona opens at $32,500. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $5,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,250 and $35,750 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Hyundai Kona hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 80% for the Hyundai Kona.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Hyundai Kona.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 7 in the Hyundai Kona.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Hyundai Kona gets a 12.3-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets cloth upholstery while the Hyundai Kona offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 1-zone in the Hyundai Kona.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 71kW and 120Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Hyundai Kona responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.

The Hyundai Kona has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 71kW. In the real-world sprint, the Hyundai Kona is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 20mm shorter than the Hyundai Kona at 4,350mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Kona generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 361L in the Hyundai Kona, giving the Hyundai Kona a 3L advantage.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.6m

Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid Urban
10.6mTighter
Best
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m
Best
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Hyundai Kona
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs $1,881 (Hyundai Kona). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Hyundai Kona?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai Kona by $5,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and Hyundai Kona all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai Kona has the largest boot at 361L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai Kona makes the most power at 110kW. The Hyundai Kona is quickest to 100km/h in 9.9s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs