CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG QS vs Volkswagen T-Roc
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG QS vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$46,990$44,990
Power153kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.1s
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km6.3 L/100km
Boot Space203L392L
Towing2,000kg1,800kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The MG QS starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Roc opens at $44,990. That makes the Volkswagen T-Roc the more affordable entry point by $2,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $49,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen T-Roc by roughly $2,990 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The MG QS features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen T-Roc gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG QS stands out with panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Volkswagen T-Roc. The Volkswagen T-Roc counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MG QS gets fabric upholstery while the Volkswagen T-Roc offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the MG QS and 2-zone in the Volkswagen T-Roc.

Drivetrain

The MG QS uses a 2.0L Turbo Petrol producing 153kW and 360Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Volkswagen T-Roc responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The MG QS has the clear power advantage at 153kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG QS measures 4,983mm long on a 2,915mm wheelbase, 732mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc at 4,251mm (2,603mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 203L in the MG QS and 392L in the Volkswagen T-Roc, giving the Volkswagen T-Roc a 189L advantage. The MG QS seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the MG QS leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Volkswagen T-Roc Style 110TSI
10.6m
Volkswagen T-Roc
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the MG QS and $1,796/year for the Volkswagen T-Roc. That is a $598 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen T-Roc.

Estimated annual total: $2,394 (MG QS) vs $1,796 (Volkswagen T-Roc). The Volkswagen T-Roc saves you roughly $598 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Roc). The MG QS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG QS if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen T-Roc if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The MG QS and Volkswagen T-Roc trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Volkswagen T-Roc will save you roughly $598 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen T-Roc has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG QS and Volkswagen T-Roc?

The Volkswagen T-Roc is the cheapest at $44,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG QS by $2,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen T-Roc uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG QS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen T-Roc has the largest boot at 392L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG QS has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG QS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG QS makes the most power at 153kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs