CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMINI Aceman vs Subaru Trailseeker
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MINI Aceman vs Subaru Trailseeker

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMINISubaru
Price (RRP)$60,990$63,990
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)352km533km
Battery54.2 kWh74.7 kWh
Power160kW280kW
0-100 km/h7.1s4.5s
Max DC Charge95kW150kW
10-80% Charge Time31 min30 min
Boot Space300L609L
Towing1,588kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the MINI Aceman & Subaru Trailseeker

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MINI Aceman starts from $60,990 before on-road costs, while the Subaru Trailseeker opens at $63,990. That makes the MINI Aceman the more affordable entry point by $3,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $67,089 and $70,389 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the MINI Aceman and Subaru Trailseeker hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MINI Aceman packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Subaru Trailseeker.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the MINI Aceman and 8 in the Subaru Trailseeker.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

49.2kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

47 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 95kW · 0–80%

31 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 95kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

77.4kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 14m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 150kW · 0–80%

31 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 150kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The MINI Aceman features a 9.4-inch touchscreen, while the Subaru Trailseeker gets a 14-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MINI Aceman stands out with panoramic roof and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Subaru Trailseeker. The Subaru Trailseeker counters with heated front seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MINI Aceman gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Subaru Trailseeker offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The MINI Aceman uses a Electric producing 160kW and 330Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.1 seconds.

The Subaru Trailseeker responds with a Dual Electric Motor making 280kW and 536Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.5 seconds.

The Subaru Trailseeker has the clear power advantage at 280kW vs 160kW. In the real-world sprint, the Subaru Trailseeker is 2.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman) vs 74.7kWh (Subaru Trailseeker), giving WLTP ranges of 352km and 533km. DC fast charging peaks at 95kW (MINI Aceman) vs 150kW (Subaru Trailseeker).

Space & Comfort

The MINI Aceman measures 4,073mm long on a 2,606mm wheelbase, 772mm shorter than the Subaru Trailseeker at 4,845mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Subaru Trailseeker generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 300L in the MINI Aceman and 609L in the Subaru Trailseeker, giving the Subaru Trailseeker a 309L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.2m

TightestMINI Aceman SE FavouredTightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
MINI Aceman SE Favoured
11.1mTighter
Best
Subaru Trailseeker AWD
11.2m
Worst
MINI Aceman SE Favoured
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru Trailseeker AWD
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMINI AcemanTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
MINI AcemanTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Subaru Trailseeker11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Trailseeker). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MINI Aceman if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru Trailseeker if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Subaru Trailseeker takes 8 of 9 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Subaru Trailseeker has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MINI Aceman and Subaru Trailseeker?

The MINI Aceman is the cheapest at $60,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru Trailseeker by $3,000.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Subaru Trailseeker has the most range at 533km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Subaru Trailseeker accepts the highest DC charging at up to 150kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MINI Aceman and Subaru Trailseeker all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru Trailseeker has the largest boot at 609L.

Which can tow the most?

The Subaru Trailseeker has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,588kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru Trailseeker makes the most power at 280kW. The Subaru Trailseeker is quickest to 100km/h in 4.5s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs