CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki S-Cross
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki S-Cross

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiSuzuki
Price (RRP)$37,740$43,490
Power113kW95kW
0-100 km/h11.9s10.5s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km5.4 L/100km
Boot Space350L430L
Towing1,200kg1,500kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi ASX starts from $37,740 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki S-Cross opens at $43,490. That makes the Mitsubishi ASX the more affordable entry point by $5,750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,514 and $47,839 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki S-Cross by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi ASX features a 10.4-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki S-Cross gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi ASX stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Suzuki S-Cross. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi ASX uses a Petrol producing 113kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.9 seconds.

The Suzuki S-Cross responds with a Petrol making 95kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki S-Cross is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi ASX measures 4,270mm long on a 2,634mm wheelbase, 30mm shorter than the Suzuki S-Cross at 4,300mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi ASX generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX and 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross, giving the Suzuki S-Cross a 80L advantage.

For towing, the Suzuki S-Cross leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.4m

Mitsubishi ASX LS
10.4mTighter
Best
Suzuki S-Cross GLX Turbo AllGrip
10.4m
Best
Mitsubishi ASX
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki S-Cross
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX and $1,539/year for the Suzuki S-Cross. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki S-Cross.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX) vs $1,539 (Suzuki S-Cross). The Suzuki S-Cross saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki S-Cross). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Suzuki S-Cross takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki S-Cross will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Suzuki S-Cross has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross?

The Mitsubishi ASX is the cheapest at $37,740 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki S-Cross by $5,750.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki S-Cross uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki S-Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki S-Cross has the largest boot at 430L.

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki S-Cross has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi ASX makes the most power at 113kW. The Suzuki S-Cross is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs