CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Lancer vs Mazda Mazda3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Lancer vs Mazda Mazda3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$26,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power125kW114kW
Fuel Economy8.9 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space295L
Towing1,000kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / 130k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mitsubishi Lancer & Mazda Mazda3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mitsubishi Lancer stands out with Rockford Fosgate audio — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda Mazda3. The Mazda Mazda3 counters with Apple CarPlay and head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Lancer uses a Petrol producing 125kW and 226Nm of torque, sent through a cvt (continuously variable transmission, invecs-iii sports mode) to a FWD layout.

The Mazda Mazda3 responds with a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol with i-stop and cylinder deactivation making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (skyactiv-drive) driving the front wheels.

The Mitsubishi Lancer has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Lancer measures 4,585mm long on a 2,635mm wheelbase, 125mm longer than the Mazda Mazda3 at 4,460mm (2,725mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mazda Mazda3 leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 10.6m

TightestMitsubishi Lancer VRX Sportback 2.4 CVTTightest turn at 10.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Lancer VRX Sportback 2.4 CVT
10.0mTighter
Best
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Worst
Mitsubishi Lancer VRX Sportback 2.4 CVT
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi LancerTightest turn at 10.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi LancerTightest10.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda310.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,537/year for the Mitsubishi Lancer and $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3. That is a $855 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda3.

Warranty: 5 years / 130,000km (Mitsubishi Lancer) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Lancer if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda Mazda3 takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Mazda Mazda3 will save you roughly $855 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Lancer and Mazda Mazda3?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda3 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Mitsubishi Lancer holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda Mazda3, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Lancer makes the most power at 125kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars