CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Nissan ARIYA vs Volvo XC40
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan ARIYA vs Volvo XC40

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 30 Aug 2026, price 24 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Nissan ARIYAEngage 63kWh FWD10?02
Volvo XC40Plus B48?04

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecNissanVolvo
Price (RRP)$55,840$54,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$55,840RRP

  • no option data for this car

$54,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeElectricPetrol
Range (WLTP)385km—
Battery63 kWh—
Power160kW145kW
0-100 km/h8s8.5s
Max DC Charge130kW—
10-80% Charge Time30 min—
Fuel Economy—7.3 L/100km
Boot (seats up)466L460L
Towing750kg2,100kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Nissan ARIYA & Volvo XC40

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Nissan ARIYA starts from $55,840 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC40 opens at $54,990. That makes the Volvo XC40 the more affordable entry point by $850.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $61,424 and $60,489 respectively.

The Nissan ARIYA currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Volvo XC40 does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Nissan ARIYA

None open on our record

Volvo XC40

  • REC-006368 · published 23 Jun 2025Due to a software issue, there is a risk that the vehicle’s braking performance may be temporarily disabled if the car has been coasting downhill for at least 1 minute and 30 seconds in ‘B’ mode (in the plug-in hybrid cars) or One Pedal Drive (in the pure electric cars).Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2025
  • REC-006080 · published 24 Sep 2024Due to a manufacturing defect, the front passenger seat mounting bolts may not have been tightened according to specifications and could become loose or detach.Year range on the notice: 2023
  • REC-005877 · published 24 Jan 2024Due to a software issue, the left turn indicator lamp may not illuminate as intended.Year range on the notice: 2023
  • 3 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

87kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 24m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 130kW · 0–80%

40 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 130kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan ARIYA features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC40 gets a 9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo XC40 counters with Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Nissan ARIYA gets nappa leather upholstery while the Volvo XC40 offers textile/leather blend.

Drivetrain

The Nissan ARIYA uses a Electric producing 160kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The Volvo XC40 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid making 145kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The Nissan ARIYA has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 145kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Nissan ARIYA is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan ARIYA measures 4,595mm long on a 2,775mm wheelbase, 155mm longer than the Volvo XC40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan ARIYA generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 466L in the Nissan ARIYA and 460L in the Volvo XC40, giving the Nissan ARIYA a 6L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo XC40 leads with a 2,100kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 1,350kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.5m

TightestVolvo XC40 Plus B4Tightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0mTighter
Best
Nissan ARIYA Engage 63kWh FWD
11.5m
Worst
Nissan ARIYA Engage 63kWh FWD
11.5m · Average

Based on 11.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo XC40 Plus B4
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo XC40Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan ARIYA11.5 m
Average△ 3-point
Volvo XC40Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan ARIYA) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC40). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan ARIYA if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo XC40 if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Nissan ARIYA: Top CarSorted Score, 73 vs 70, but the Volvo XC40 is $850 cheaper

The Nissan ARIYA comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (73 vs 70), taking 4 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Nissan ARIYA ahead by 25), practicality (Volvo XC40 ahead by 12), fuel economy (Volvo XC40 ahead by 7). The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan ARIYA and Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan ARIYA by $850.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volvo XC40 uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Nissan ARIYA holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volvo XC40, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Nissan ARIYA has the largest boot at 466L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo XC40 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan ARIYA makes the most power at 160kW. The Nissan ARIYA is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best hybrid cars