CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan Navara vs Kia Rondo
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Navara vs Kia Rondo

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Kia Rondo: we're still completing wheelbase, kerb weight, 0-100km/h, ground clearance and turning circle.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecNissanKia
Price (RRP)$26,490$25,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power122kW106kW
Fuel Economy9.9 L/100km8.7 L/100km
Towing1,588kg1,400kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars4 Stars

Track the Nissan Navara & Kia Rondo

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Nissan Navara starts from $26,490 before on-road costs, while the Kia Rondo opens at $25,990. That makes the Kia Rondo the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $29,139 and $28,589 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Kia Rondo by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The Nissan Navara holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Kia Rondo.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 0 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 7 in the Nissan Navara and 6 in the Kia Rondo.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Navara lines up producing 122kW and 238Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual (7-speed automatic optional) to a RWD layout.

The Kia Rondo lines up making 106kW and 189Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The Nissan Navara has the clear power advantage at 122kW vs 106kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan Navara measures 5,255mm long on a 3,150mm wheelbase, 710mm longer than the Kia Rondo at 4,545mm.

For towing, the Nissan Navara leads with a 1,588kg braked capacity vs 1,400kg. That 188kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m diameter

Average

Nissan Navara Dual Cab DX Pick Up 4x2
11.8m
Nissan Navara Dual Cab DX Pick Up 4x2
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Nissan Navara Turning circle · Ø 11.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.0 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,822/year for the Nissan Navara and $2,480/year for the Kia Rondo. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Kia Rondo.

Estimated annual total: $2,822 (Nissan Navara) vs $2,480 (Kia Rondo). The Kia Rondo saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Nissan Navara) vs 5 years (Kia Rondo). The Kia Rondo has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Navara if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia Rondo if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Nissan Navara and Kia Rondo trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Kia Rondo will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. The Kia Rondo adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Navara and Kia Rondo?

The Kia Rondo is the cheapest at $25,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan Navara by $500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Kia Rondo uses the least fuel at 8.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Nissan Navara has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan Navara has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,588kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Rondo has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan Navara makes the most power at 122kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All People Movers · Best utes in Australia · Best family cars