CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan Z vs Peugeot RCZ
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Z vs Peugeot RCZ

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanPeugeot
Price (RRP)$76,160TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power298kW115kW
0-100 km/h4.6s8.3s
Fuel Economy10.8 L/100km6.7 L/100km
Boot Space241L384L
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Nissan Z & Peugeot RCZ

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Nissan Z stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats and Bose audio that you will not find on the Peugeot RCZ. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Z uses a Petrol producing 298kW and 475Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.6 seconds.

The Peugeot RCZ responds with a 1.6L THP turbo petrol making 115kW and 240Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.3 seconds.

The Nissan Z has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 115kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan Z is 3.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan Z measures 4,380mm long on a 2,550mm wheelbase, 93mm longer than the Peugeot RCZ at 4,287mm (2,612mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot RCZ generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 241L in the Nissan Z and 384L in the Peugeot RCZ, giving the Peugeot RCZ a 143L advantage. The Peugeot RCZ seats 4 vs 2.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.0m

TightestPeugeot RCZ 1.6 THP 156Tightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP 156
10.4mTighter
Best
Nissan Z Coupe Manual
11.0m
Worst
Nissan Z Coupe Manual
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Peugeot RCZ 1.6 THP 156
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestPeugeot RCZTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan Z11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Peugeot RCZTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,078/year for the Nissan Z and $1,910/year for the Peugeot RCZ. That is a $1,168 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot RCZ.

Estimated annual total: $3,078 (Nissan Z) vs $1,910 (Peugeot RCZ). The Peugeot RCZ saves you roughly $1,168 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Z) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Peugeot RCZ). The Nissan Z has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Z if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot RCZ if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Nissan Z takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Peugeot RCZ will save you roughly $1,168 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot RCZ has a clear edge. The Nissan Z adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Z and Peugeot RCZ?

The Nissan Z is the cheapest at $76,160 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot RCZ uses the least fuel at 6.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Nissan Z and Peugeot RCZ carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot RCZ has the largest boot at 384L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Nissan Z has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan Z makes the most power at 298kW. The Nissan Z is quickest to 100km/h in 4.6s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars