CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsPeugeot 207 CC vs Mazda MX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Peugeot 207 CC vs Mazda MX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Convertibles compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Peugeot 207 CC: we're still completing price, seat count, warranty and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecPeugeotMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$41,520
Fuel typePetrol
Power88kW135kW
0-100 km/h10.7s6.5s
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km6.8 L/100km
Boot Space449L130L
Towing1,040kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Peugeot 207 CC & Mazda MX-5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Peugeot 207 CC stands out with head-up display — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda MX-5. The Mazda MX-5 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Peugeot 207 CC lines up producing 88kW and 160Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.7 seconds.

The Mazda MX-5 responds with a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol (Skyactiv-G) making 135kW and 205Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual (skyactiv-mt) driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.5 seconds.

The Mazda MX-5 has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 88kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda MX-5 is 4.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Peugeot 207 CC measures 4,037mm long on a 2,540mm wheelbase, 122mm longer than the Mazda MX-5 at 3,915mm (2,310mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Peugeot 207 CC generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 449L in the Peugeot 207 CC and 130L in the Mazda MX-5, giving the Peugeot 207 CC a 319L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 10.6m

TightestMazda MX-5 RoadsterTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda MX-5 Roadster
9.4mTighter
Best
Peugeot 207 CC 1.6
10.6m
Worst
Peugeot 207 CC 1.6
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda MX-5 Roadster
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda MX-5Tightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Peugeot 207 CC10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda MX-5Tightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the Peugeot 207 CC and $1,938/year for the Mazda MX-5. That is a $85 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 207 CC.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Peugeot 207 CC if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda MX-5 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Peugeot 207 CC and Mazda MX-5 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Peugeot 207 CC will save you roughly $85 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 207 CC has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Peugeot 207 CC and Mazda MX-5?

The Mazda MX-5 is the cheapest at $41,520 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 207 CC uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Peugeot 207 CC and Mazda MX-5 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 207 CC has the largest boot at 449L.

Which can tow the most?

The Peugeot 207 CC has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,040kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda MX-5 makes the most power at 135kW. The Mazda MX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · Best family cars