CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG Cyberster vs Peugeot 207 CC
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG Cyberster vs Peugeot 207 CC

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Convertibles compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Peugeot 207 CC: we're still completing price, seat count, warranty and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMGPeugeot
Price (RRP)$99,900TBC
Fuel typeElectric
Range (WLTP)519km
Battery77 kWh
Power375kW88kW
0-100 km/h3.2s10.7s
Max DC Charge144kW
10-80% Charge Time25 min
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km
Boot Space249L449L
Towing1,040kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the MG Cyberster & Peugeot 207 CC

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

74kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 11m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 144kW · 0–80%

31 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 144kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The MG Cyberster stands out with Apple CarPlay and Bose audio — features our data doesn't list for the Peugeot 207 CC. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG Cyberster uses a Electric Motor producing 375kW and 725Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.2 seconds.

The Peugeot 207 CC lines up making 88kW and 160Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.7 seconds.

The MG Cyberster has the clear power advantage at 375kW vs 88kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the MG Cyberster is 7.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG Cyberster measures 4,535mm long on a 2,690mm wheelbase, 498mm longer than the Peugeot 207 CC at 4,037mm (2,540mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG Cyberster generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 249L in the MG Cyberster and 449L in the Peugeot 207 CC, giving the Peugeot 207 CC a 200L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Peugeot 207 CC 1.6
10.6m
Peugeot 207 CC 1.6
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Peugeot 207 CC Turning circle · Ø 10.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.5 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG Cyberster if: You prioritise performance, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot 207 CC if: You need more boot space, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG Cyberster takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 207 CC has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG Cyberster and Peugeot 207 CC?

The MG Cyberster is the cheapest at $99,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 207 CC uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of MG Cyberster and Peugeot 207 CC carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 207 CC has the largest boot at 449L.

Which can tow the most?

The Peugeot 207 CC has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,040kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG Cyberster makes the most power at 375kW. The MG Cyberster is quickest to 100km/h in 3.2s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Convertibles · Best electric cars · Best family cars