CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsProton Gen.2 vs Mazda Mazda3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Proton Gen.2 vs Mazda Mazda3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Proton Gen.2: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecProtonMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$26,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power82kW114kW
0-100 km/h9.7s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space295L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Proton Gen.2 & Mazda Mazda3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda Mazda3 counters with Apple CarPlay and head-up display that the Proton Gen.2 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Proton Gen.2 gets leather upholstery while the Mazda Mazda3 offers black cloth.

Drivetrain

The Proton Gen.2 uses a Petrol producing 82kW and 148Nm of torque, sent through a 4 speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Mazda Mazda3 responds with a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol with i-stop and cylinder deactivation making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (skyactiv-drive) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda3 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 82kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Proton Gen.2 measures 4,310mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 150mm shorter than the Mazda Mazda3 at 4,460mm (2,725mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

5.4m to 10.6m

TightestProton Gen.2 GXR 4 Speed AutomaticTightest turn at 5.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Proton Gen.2 GXR 4 Speed Automatic
5.4mTighter
Best
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Worst
Proton Gen.2 GXR 4 Speed Automatic
5.4m · Excellent

Based on 5.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestProton Gen.2Tightest turn at 5.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Proton Gen.2Tightest5.4 m
Excellent✓ Clears
Mazda Mazda310.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

1 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the Proton Gen.2 and $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda3.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (Proton Gen.2) vs $1,682 (Mazda Mazda3). The Mazda Mazda3 saves you roughly $570 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years (Proton Gen.2) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3). The Mazda Mazda3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Proton Gen.2 if: You or prefer Proton's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda Mazda3 takes 3 of 3 key spec categories. The Mazda Mazda3 will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. The Mazda Mazda3 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Proton Gen.2 and Mazda Mazda3?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda3 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Proton Gen.2 and Mazda Mazda3 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda Mazda3 makes the most power at 114kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars