CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Koleos vs Isuzu MU-X
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Koleos vs Isuzu MU-X

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultIsuzu
Price (RRP)$34,990$43,900
Power140kW120kW
0-100 km/h9.1s11s
Fuel Economy7.8 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space458L311L
Towing2,000kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km6yr / 150k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Renault Koleos starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Isuzu MU-X opens at $43,900. That makes the Renault Koleos the more affordable entry point by $8,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $48,290 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Isuzu MU-X by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Renault Koleos features a 8.7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Isuzu MU-X gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Renault Koleos stands out with Apple CarPlay and BOSE audio that you will not find on the Isuzu MU-X. The Isuzu MU-X counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Renault Koleos gets leather upholstery while the Isuzu MU-X offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Renault Koleos uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Isuzu MU-X responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11 seconds.

The Renault Koleos has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Renault Koleos is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Koleos measures 4,672mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 188mm shorter than the Isuzu MU-X at 4,860mm (2,855mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 458L in the Renault Koleos and 311L in the Isuzu MU-X, giving the Renault Koleos a 147L advantage. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.6m

Renault Koleos Evolution 4x2
11.6mTighter
Best
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Best
Renault Koleos
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Isuzu MU-X
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,223/year for the Renault Koleos and $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $2,223 (Renault Koleos) vs $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Renault Koleos) vs 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X). The Renault Koleos has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Koleos if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Koleos takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Koleos has a clear edge. The Renault Koleos adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Koleos and Isuzu MU-X?

The Renault Koleos is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Isuzu MU-X by $8,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu MU-X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Koleos has the largest boot at 458L.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Renault Koleos has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Renault Koleos makes the most power at 140kW. The Renault Koleos is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs