CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Symbioz vs Suzuki S-Cross
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Symbioz vs Suzuki S-Cross

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultSuzuki
Price (RRP)$42,990$43,490
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power116kW103kW
0-100 km/h10.6s10.5s
Fuel Economy4.7 L/100km6.2 L/100km
Boot Space492L430L
Towing750kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Renault Symbioz & Suzuki S-Cross

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Renault Symbioz starts from $42,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki S-Cross opens at $43,490. That makes the Renault Symbioz the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $47,289 and $47,839 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Symbioz by roughly $2,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Renault Symbioz features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki S-Cross gets a 9-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The Suzuki S-Cross counters with wireless charging and power tailgate that the Renault Symbioz does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Symbioz uses a Inline 4 producing 116kW and 149Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.6 seconds.

The Suzuki S-Cross responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Renault Symbioz has the clear power advantage at 116kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki S-Cross is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Symbioz measures 4,413mm long on a 2,638mm wheelbase, 108mm longer than the Suzuki S-Cross at 4,305mm (2,600mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Renault Symbioz generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 492L in the Renault Symbioz and 430L in the Suzuki S-Cross, giving the Renault Symbioz a 62L advantage.

For towing, the Suzuki S-Cross leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 750kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.1m

Suzuki S-Cross GLX Turbo AllGrip
10.8mTighter
Best
Renault Symbioz E-Tech Full Hybrid
11.1m
Worst
Renault Symbioz E-Tech Full Hybrid
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki S-Cross GLX Turbo AllGrip
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,340/year for the Renault Symbioz and $1,767/year for the Suzuki S-Cross. That is a $427 annual difference in favour of the Renault Symbioz.

Estimated annual total: $1,340 (Renault Symbioz) vs $1,767 (Suzuki S-Cross). The Renault Symbioz saves you roughly $427 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Symbioz) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki S-Cross). The Renault Symbioz has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Symbioz if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki S-Cross if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Symbioz takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Renault Symbioz will save you roughly $427 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Symbioz has a clear edge. The Renault Symbioz adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Symbioz and Suzuki S-Cross?

The Renault Symbioz is the cheapest at $42,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki S-Cross by $500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Renault Symbioz uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki S-Cross all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Symbioz has the largest boot at 492L.

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki S-Cross has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Renault Symbioz has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Renault Symbioz makes the most power at 116kW. The Suzuki S-Cross is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs