Skoda Karoq vs Honda CR-V
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Karoq starts from $40,990 before on-road costs, while the Honda CR-V opens at $37,000. That makes the Honda CR-V the more affordable entry point by $3,990.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $45,089 and $40,700 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Karoq by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Skoda Karoq and Honda CR-V hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 93% for the Skoda Karoq and 88% for the Honda CR-V.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Skoda Karoq and 11 in the Honda CR-V.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Karoq features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Honda CR-V gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Honda CR-V counters with power tailgate that the Skoda Karoq does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Skoda Karoq gets cloth upholstery while the Honda CR-V offers leather.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Karoq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.
The Honda CR-V responds with a Petrol making 140kW and 240Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.
The Honda CR-V has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda CR-V is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Karoq measures 4,382mm long on a 2,638mm wheelbase, 322mm shorter than the Honda CR-V at 4,704mm (2,701mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda CR-V generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 521L in the Skoda Karoq and 561L in the Honda CR-V, giving the Honda CR-V a 40L advantage.
For towing, the Honda CR-V leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 12.0m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,767/year for the Skoda Karoq and $2,024/year for the Honda CR-V. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Karoq.
Estimated annual total: $1,767 (Skoda Karoq) vs $2,024 (Honda CR-V). The Skoda Karoq saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Karoq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda CR-V). The Skoda Karoq has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Honda CR-V).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Karoq if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Honda CR-V if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Honda CR-V takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Karoq will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Honda CR-V has a clear edge. The Skoda Karoq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Karoq and Honda CR-V?
The Honda CR-V is the cheapest at $37,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Karoq by $3,990.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Skoda Karoq uses the least fuel at 6.2L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Skoda Karoq and Honda CR-V all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Honda CR-V has the largest boot at 561L.
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Karoq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Karoq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Honda CR-V makes the most power at 140kW. The Honda CR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
