Honda CR-V vs Mitsubishi ASX
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Honda CR-V starts from $37,000 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi ASX opens at $37,740. That makes the Honda CR-V the more affordable entry point by $740.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,700 and $41,514 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi ASX by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Honda CR-V holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Mitsubishi ASX.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Honda CR-V packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mitsubishi ASX.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 11 in the Honda CR-V and 7 in the Mitsubishi ASX.
Feature Showdown
The Honda CR-V features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi ASX gets a 10.4-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Honda CR-V stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Mitsubishi ASX. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Honda CR-V gets leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi ASX offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Honda CR-V and 1-zone in the Mitsubishi ASX.
Drivetrain
The Honda CR-V uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 240Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.
The Mitsubishi ASX responds with a Petrol making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.9 seconds.
The Honda CR-V has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 113kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda CR-V is 3.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Honda CR-V measures 4,704mm long on a 2,701mm wheelbase, 434mm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX at 4,270mm (2,634mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda CR-V generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 561L in the Honda CR-V and 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX, giving the Honda CR-V a 211L advantage.
For towing, the Honda CR-V leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 12.0m
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,024/year for the Honda CR-V and $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi ASX.
Estimated annual total: $2,024 (Honda CR-V) vs $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX saves you roughly $200 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Honda CR-V) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Honda CR-V)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Honda CR-V if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Honda CR-V takes 6 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi ASX will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Honda CR-V has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi ASX?
The Honda CR-V is the cheapest at $37,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi ASX by $740.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi ASX uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Honda CR-V has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Honda CR-V has the largest boot at 561L.
Which can tow the most?
The Honda CR-V has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Honda CR-V makes the most power at 140kW. The Honda CR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
