CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kodiaq vs Toyota Prado
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota Prado

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaToyota
Price (RRP)$54,990$73,200
Power110kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.1s9.6s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km10.6 L/100km
Boot Space270L390L
Towing2,000kg3,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Prado opens at $73,200. That makes the Skoda Kodiaq the more affordable entry point by $18,210.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $80,520 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kodiaq by roughly $5,985 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota Prado hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq and 85% for the Toyota Prado.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Skoda Kodiaq packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Toyota Prado.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq and 9 in the Toyota Prado.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Prado gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Kodiaq stands out with heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Toyota Prado. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Toyota Prado responds with a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.6 seconds.

The Toyota Prado has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 232mm shorter than the Toyota Prado at 4,990mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Prado generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 390L in the Toyota Prado, giving the Toyota Prado a 120L advantage. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota Prado leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.8m

Skoda Kodiaq 110TSI
11.4mTighter
Best
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
11.8m
Worst
Skoda Kodiaq
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Prado
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $3,021/year for the Toyota Prado. That is a $1,197 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kodiaq.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq) vs $3,021 (Toyota Prado). The Skoda Kodiaq saves you roughly $1,197 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Prado). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Prado if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Kodiaq takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Kodiaq will save you roughly $1,197 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota Prado has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota Prado?

The Skoda Kodiaq is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Prado by $18,210.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kodiaq uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota Prado all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota Prado has the largest boot at 390L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Prado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Prado makes the most power at 150kW. The Skoda Kodiaq is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs