Skoda Kodiaq vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV opens at $53,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV the more affordable entry point by $1,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $59,389 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Kodiaq by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq and 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq and 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Skoda Kodiaq stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and heated front seats that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV responds with a Petrol making 98kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.
The Skoda Kodiaq has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 98kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 48mm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV at 4,710mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, giving the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV a 208L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2005L vs 1500L.
For towing, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.4m
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $2,081/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Kodiaq.
Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq) vs $2,081 (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV). The Skoda Kodiaq saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Kodiaq will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
