CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kodiaq vs CUPRA Terramar
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kodiaq vs CUPRA Terramar

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaCUPRA
Price (RRP)$54,990$53,990
Power110kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.1s9.3s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km5.7 L/100km
Boot Space270L508L
Towing2,000kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the CUPRA Terramar opens at $53,990. That makes the CUPRA Terramar the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $59,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Kodiaq and CUPRA Terramar hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq and 89% for the CUPRA Terramar.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The CUPRA Terramar packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Skoda Kodiaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq and 7 in the CUPRA Terramar. The CUPRA Terramar adds a 360-degree camera that the Skoda Kodiaq misses.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the CUPRA Terramar gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The CUPRA Terramar counters with ambient lighting that the Skoda Kodiaq does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kodiaq gets leather upholstery while the CUPRA Terramar offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The CUPRA Terramar responds with a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.3 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 239mm longer than the CUPRA Terramar at 4,519mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 508L in the CUPRA Terramar, giving the CUPRA Terramar a 238L advantage. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.4m

Skoda Kodiaq 110TSI
11.4mTighter
Best
CUPRA Terramar S
11.4m
Best
Skoda Kodiaq
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
CUPRA Terramar
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $1,625/year for the CUPRA Terramar. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the CUPRA Terramar.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Skoda Kodiaq) vs $1,625 (CUPRA Terramar). The CUPRA Terramar saves you roughly $199 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Terramar). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the CUPRA Terramar if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Skoda Kodiaq and CUPRA Terramar trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The CUPRA Terramar will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the CUPRA Terramar has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and CUPRA Terramar?

The CUPRA Terramar is the cheapest at $53,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The CUPRA Terramar uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq and CUPRA Terramar all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The CUPRA Terramar has the largest boot at 508L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs