Skoda Kodiaq vs CUPRA Terramar
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Skoda Kodiaq & CUPRA Terramar
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the CUPRA Terramar opens at $53,990. That makes the CUPRA Terramar the more affordable entry point by $1,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $59,389 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the CUPRA Terramar by roughly $4,700 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Skoda Kodiaq and CUPRA Terramar hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq and 89% for the CUPRA Terramar.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 9 of 10 key ADAS systems on the CUPRA Terramar, against 6 on the Skoda Kodiaq.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq and 7 in the CUPRA Terramar.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the CUPRA Terramar gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The CUPRA Terramar counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kodiaq gets leather upholstery while the CUPRA Terramar offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 320Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.
The CUPRA Terramar responds with a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.3 seconds.
The Skoda Kodiaq has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 110kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 239mm longer than the CUPRA Terramar at 4,519mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Kodiaq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 289L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 508L in the CUPRA Terramar, giving the CUPRA Terramar a 219L advantage. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,300kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 11.4m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,565/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $1,625/year for the CUPRA Terramar. That is a $940 annual difference in favour of the CUPRA Terramar.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Terramar). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the CUPRA Terramar if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Skoda Kodiaq takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The CUPRA Terramar will save you roughly $940 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the CUPRA Terramar has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and CUPRA Terramar?
The CUPRA Terramar is the cheapest at $53,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $1,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The CUPRA Terramar uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Skoda Kodiaq and CUPRA Terramar all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The CUPRA Terramar has the largest boot at 508L.
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,300kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Skoda Kodiaq makes the most power at 140kW. The Skoda Kodiaq is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!










