CUPRA Terramar vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

The CUPRA Terramar starts from $53,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV opens at $58,990. That makes the CUPRA Terramar the more affordable entry point by $5,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,389 and $64,889 respectively.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The CUPRA Terramar, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV by roughly $7,835 in fuel alone.

Both the CUPRA Terramar and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the CUPRA Terramar and 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The CUPRA Terramar packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the CUPRA Terramar and 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. The CUPRA Terramar adds a 360-degree camera that the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV misses.

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

The CUPRA Terramar features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The CUPRA Terramar stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV counters with Apple CarPlay and Yamaha audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the CUPRA Terramar gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the CUPRA Terramar and 2-zone in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

The CUPRA Terramar uses a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol MHEV producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV responds with a Petrol making 221kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the clear power advantage at 221kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

The CUPRA Terramar measures 4,519mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 201mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV at 4,720mm (2,704mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 508L in the CUPRA Terramar and 472L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, giving the CUPRA Terramar a 36L advantage.

For towing, the CUPRA Terramar leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,625/year for the CUPRA Terramar and $58/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. That is a $1,567 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Estimated annual total: $1,625 (CUPRA Terramar) vs $58 (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV saves you roughly $1,567 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Terramar) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.