Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs Skoda Enyaq
Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV starts from $58,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV the more affordable entry point by $1,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $64,889 and $65,989 respectively.
Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and Skoda Enyaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Skoda Enyaq.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Skoda Enyaq adds a 360-degree camera that the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV misses.
Feature Showdown
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV stands out with Apple CarPlay and Yamaha audio that you will not find on the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Enyaq offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq.
Drivetrain
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses a Petrol producing 225kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.
The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.4 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the clear power advantage at 225kW vs 210kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 20kWh (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq), giving WLTP ranges of 84km and 575km. DC fast charging peaks at 50kW (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 175kW (Skoda Enyaq).
Space & Comfort
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV measures 4,710mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 51mm longer than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,659mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Enyaq generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 107L advantage. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV seats 7 vs 5.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m to 11.0m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You need more boot space, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Skoda Enyaq takes 6 of 9 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and Skoda Enyaq?
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is the cheapest at $58,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Enyaq by $1,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and Skoda Enyaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV makes the most power at 225kW. The Skoda Enyaq is quickest to 100km/h in 5.4s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!








