Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs Skoda Enyaq

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV starts from $58,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $64,889 and $65,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Both the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and Skoda Enyaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Skoda Enyaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 9 in the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq adds a 360-degree camera that the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV misses.

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV stands out with Apple CarPlay and Yamaha audio that you will not find on the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Enyaq offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 3-zone in the Skoda Enyaq.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses a Petrol producing 221kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.7 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the clear power advantage at 221kW vs 210kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 22.7kWh (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq), giving WLTP ranges of 84km and 575km. DC fast charging peaks at 50kW (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 175kW (Skoda Enyaq).

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV measures 4,720mm long on a 2,704mm wheelbase, 62mm longer than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,658mm (2,766mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Enyaq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 472L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 113L advantage.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV leads with a 1,600kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.