Skoda Kodiaq vs Ford Everest
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Skoda Kodiaq & Ford Everest
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Ford Everest opens at $68,990. That makes the Skoda Kodiaq the more affordable entry point by $14,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $75,889 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Skoda Kodiaq and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq and 86% for the Ford Everest.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Ford Everest, against 6 on the Skoda Kodiaq.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq and 9 in the Ford Everest.
Feature Showdown
The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Ford Everest gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Everest counters with wireless charging and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 320Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.
The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 140kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 220mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 289L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Skoda Kodiaq a 30L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2035L vs 1818L.
For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,300kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 11.8m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,565/year for the Skoda Kodiaq and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Skoda Kodiaq and Ford Everest trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and Ford Everest?
The Skoda Kodiaq is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $14,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Skoda Kodiaq and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the largest boot at 289L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
