Ford Everest vs Volvo XC60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Ford Everest
From $68,990
SUV
Diesel
Diesel V6 Turbo
184kW
8.5 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
259L
Volvo XC60
From $74,990
SUV
Petrol
2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5
183kW
7.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
483L
Track the Ford Everest & Volvo XC60
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Ford Everest starts from $68,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC60 opens at $74,990. That makes the Ford Everest the more affordable entry point by $6,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $75,889 and $82,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volvo XC60 by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Ford Everest features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC60 gets a 11.2-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Ford Everest stands out with ventilated seats that you will not find on the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 counters with head-up display, panoramic roof and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Ford Everest uses a Diesel V6 Turbo producing 184kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout.
The Volvo XC60 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 making 183kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.9 seconds.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 183kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 270mm longer than the Volvo XC60 at 4,708mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 483L in the Volvo XC60, giving the Volvo XC60 a 224L advantage. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Ford Everest and $2,166/year for the Volvo XC60. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC60.
Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Ford Everest) vs $2,166 (Volvo XC60). The Volvo XC60 saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC60). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Everest if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volvo XC60 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford Everest takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volvo XC60 will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volvo XC60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Volvo XC60?
The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo XC60 by $6,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Volvo XC60 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Volvo XC60 has the largest boot at 483L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
