CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi Q3 Sportback vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi Q3 Sportback vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiFord
Price (RRP)$64,600$68,990
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power110kW184kW
0-100 km/h9.1s
Fuel Economy5.8 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space488L259L
Towing3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Audi Q3 Sportback & Ford Everest

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi Q3 Sportback starts from $64,600 before on-road costs, while the Ford Everest opens at $68,990. That makes the Audi Q3 Sportback the more affordable entry point by $4,390.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $71,060 and $75,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi Q3 Sportback by roughly $3,850 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Audi Q3 Sportback and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 87% for the Audi Q3 Sportback and 86% for the Ford Everest.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Ford Everest, against 6 on the Audi Q3 Sportback.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Audi Q3 Sportback and 9 in the Ford Everest.

Feature Showdown

The Audi Q3 Sportback features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Ford Everest gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi Q3 Sportback stands out with Apple CarPlay, head-up display, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Audi Q3 Sportback uses a 4-cylinder inline petrol with turbocharging, MHEV technology and Cylinder on Demand (CoD) producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed s tronic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi Q3 Sportback measures 4,531mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 447mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 488L in the Audi Q3 Sportback and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Audi Q3 Sportback a 229L advantage. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.7m to 11.8m

TightestAudi Q3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW SportbackTightest turn at 11.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Audi Q3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW Sportback
11.7mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Audi Q3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW Sportback
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAudi Q3 SportbackTightest turn at 11.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Audi Q3 SportbackTightest11.7 m
Average△ 3-point
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,653/year for the Audi Q3 Sportback and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $770 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q3 Sportback.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q3 Sportback) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi Q3 Sportback if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Audi Q3 Sportback takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi Q3 Sportback will save you roughly $770 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Audi Q3 Sportback has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi Q3 Sportback and Ford Everest?

The Audi Q3 Sportback is the cheapest at $64,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $4,390.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi Q3 Sportback uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Audi Q3 Sportback and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi Q3 Sportback has the largest boot at 488L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs