CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi Q3 Sportback vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi Q3 Sportback vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$64,600$58,990
Fuel typePetrolPlug-in Hybrid
Range (WLTP)84km
Battery22.7 kWh
Electric range86km
Power110kW221kW
0-100 km/h9.1s
Max DC Charge50kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy5.8 L/100km1.5 kWh/100km
Boot Space488L494L
Towing1,600kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Audi Q3 Sportback & Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi Q3 Sportback starts from $64,600 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV opens at $58,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV the more affordable entry point by $5,610.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $71,060 and $64,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV by roughly $7,905 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Audi Q3 Sportback and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 87% for the Audi Q3 Sportback and 83% for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Audi Q3 Sportback and 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

22.7kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

22 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 50kW · 0–80%

27 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 50kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Audi Q3 Sportback features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi Q3 Sportback stands out with head-up display, Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV counters with Yamaha audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi Q3 Sportback gets leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Audi Q3 Sportback uses a 4-cylinder inline petrol with turbocharging, MHEV technology and Cylinder on Demand (CoD) producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed s tronic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV responds with a Petrol making 221kW and 450Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the clear power advantage at 221kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi Q3 Sportback measures 4,531mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 189mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV at 4,720mm (2,704mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 488L in the Audi Q3 Sportback and 494L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, giving the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV a 6L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.7m

TightestMitsubishi Outlander PHEV ESTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV ES
11.2mTighter
Best
Audi Q3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW Sportback
11.7m
Worst
Audi Q3 Sportback TFSI 110 kW Sportback
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV ES
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi Outlander PHEVTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Audi Q3 Sportback11.7 m
Average△ 3-point
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEVTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,653/year for the Audi Q3 Sportback and $72/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. That is a $1,581 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q3 Sportback) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi Q3 Sportback if: You or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV takes 4 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV will save you roughly $1,581 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi Q3 Sportback and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is the cheapest at $58,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi Q3 Sportback by $5,610.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses the least fuel at 1.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Audi Q3 Sportback and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the largest boot at 494L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV makes the most power at 221kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs