CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSubaru Forester vs Skoda Karoq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Subaru Forester vs Skoda Karoq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSubaruSkoda
Price (RRP)$45,990$44,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power136kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.2s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space496L521L
Towing1,800kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Subaru Forester & Skoda Karoq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Subaru Forester starts from $45,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Karoq opens at $44,490. That makes the Skoda Karoq the more affordable entry point by $1,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $50,589 and $48,939 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Karoq by roughly $1,855 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Subaru Forester features a 11.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Karoq gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Karoq counters with power tailgate, Canton audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Subaru Forester uses a Petrol producing 136kW and 247Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a AWD layout.

The Skoda Karoq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a 8 speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.2 seconds.

The Subaru Forester has the clear power advantage at 136kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Subaru Forester measures 4,655mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 265mm longer than the Skoda Karoq at 4,390mm (2,638mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Subaru Forester generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 496L in the Subaru Forester and 521L in the Skoda Karoq, giving the Skoda Karoq a 25L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1174L vs 1630L.

For towing, the Subaru Forester leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 10.8m

TightestSkoda Karoq 110TSI SportlineTightest turn at 10.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Karoq 110TSI Sportline
10.2mTighter
Best
Subaru Forester AWD
10.8m
Worst
Subaru Forester AWD
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Karoq 110TSI Sportline
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda KaroqTightest turn at 10.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Subaru Forester10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Skoda KaroqTightest10.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the Subaru Forester and $1,881/year for the Skoda Karoq. That is a $371 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Karoq.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Forester) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Karoq). The Skoda Karoq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Subaru Forester if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Karoq if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Karoq takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Karoq will save you roughly $371 a year in fuel. The Skoda Karoq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Subaru Forester and Skoda Karoq?

The Skoda Karoq is the cheapest at $44,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru Forester by $1,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Karoq uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Subaru Forester holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Skoda Karoq, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Karoq has the largest boot at 521L.

Which can tow the most?

The Subaru Forester has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Karoq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru Forester makes the most power at 136kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs