GWM Haval H6GT vs Skoda Karoq
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the GWM Haval H6GT & Skoda Karoq
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The GWM Haval H6GT starts from $44,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Karoq opens at $44,490. That makes the Skoda Karoq the more affordable entry point by $500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $49,489 and $48,939 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Karoq by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The GWM Haval H6GT features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Karoq gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Haval H6GT stands out with head-up display, wireless charging and heated front seats — features our data doesn't list for the Skoda Karoq. The Skoda Karoq counters with Canton audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the GWM Haval H6GT gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Skoda Karoq offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The GWM Haval H6GT uses a Petrol producing 150kW and 320Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Skoda Karoq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a 8 speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.2 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6GT has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 110kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the GWM Haval H6GT is 0.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM Haval H6GT measures 4,727mm long on a 2,738mm wheelbase, 337mm longer than the Skoda Karoq at 4,390mm (2,638mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H6GT generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 392L in the GWM Haval H6GT and 521L in the Skoda Karoq, giving the Skoda Karoq a 129L advantage.
For towing, the GWM Haval H6GT leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.2m to 12.0m
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the GWM Haval H6GT and $1,881/year for the Skoda Karoq. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Karoq.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6GT) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Karoq). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Karoq if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The GWM Haval H6GT and Skoda Karoq trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Skoda Karoq will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Karoq has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM Haval H6GT and Skoda Karoq?
The Skoda Karoq is the cheapest at $44,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Haval H6GT by $500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Skoda Karoq uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of GWM Haval H6GT and Skoda Karoq carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Karoq has the largest boot at 521L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM Haval H6GT makes the most power at 150kW. The GWM Haval H6GT is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!









