Suzuki Fronx vs Hyundai Kona
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Fronx starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Hyundai Kona opens at $32,500. That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $4,010.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $35,750 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Suzuki Fronx and Hyundai Kona hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 48% for the Suzuki Fronx and 80% for the Hyundai Kona.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Fronx packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the Hyundai Kona.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Fronx and 7 in the Hyundai Kona.
Feature Showdown
The Suzuki Fronx features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Hyundai Kona gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 74kW and 147Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Hyundai Kona responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 180Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.
The Hyundai Kona has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 74kW. In the real-world sprint, the Hyundai Kona is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 355mm shorter than the Hyundai Kona at 4,350mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Kona generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 308L in the Suzuki Fronx and 361L in the Hyundai Kona, giving the Hyundai Kona a 53L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $1,682 (Suzuki Fronx) vs $1,881 (Hyundai Kona). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $199 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona). The Hyundai Kona has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Hyundai Kona takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai Kona has a clear edge. The Hyundai Kona adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki Fronx and Hyundai Kona?
The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $28,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai Kona by $4,010.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki Fronx and Hyundai Kona all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Hyundai Kona has the largest boot at 361L.
Which can tow the most?
The Hyundai Kona has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Hyundai Kona has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Hyundai Kona makes the most power at 110kW. The Hyundai Kona is quickest to 100km/h in 9.9s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
