CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Fronx vs Chery Tiggo 7
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Fronx vs Chery Tiggo 7

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiChery
Price (RRP)$28,490$29,990
Power74kW108kW
0-100 km/h11.5s9.5s
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space308L475L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Fronx starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 7 opens at $29,990. That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $1,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Suzuki Fronx and Chery Tiggo 7 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 48% for the Suzuki Fronx and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 7.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Fronx and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 7.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki Fronx features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 7 gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 74kW and 147Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 74kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 7 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 545mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 7 at 4,540mm (2,661mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 7 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 308L in the Suzuki Fronx and 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7, giving the Chery Tiggo 7 a 167L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.2m

Suzuki Fronx GL
10.4mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 7 Urban
11.2m
Worst
Suzuki Fronx
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 7
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $1,967/year for the Chery Tiggo 7. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.

Estimated annual total: $1,682 (Suzuki Fronx) vs $1,967 (Chery Tiggo 7). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 7). The Chery Tiggo 7 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 7 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 7 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 7 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs