Suzuki Fronx vs Honda HR-V
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Fronx starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Honda HR-V opens at $32,900. That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $4,410.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $36,190 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
Both the Suzuki Fronx and Honda HR-V hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 48% for the Suzuki Fronx and 82% for the Honda HR-V.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Fronx packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Honda HR-V.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Fronx and 6 in the Honda HR-V.
Feature Showdown
The Suzuki Fronx features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Honda HR-V gets a 9-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Honda HR-V counters with ambient lighting that the Suzuki Fronx does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 74kW and 147Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Honda HR-V responds with a Petrol making 89kW and 145Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.2 seconds.
The Honda HR-V has the clear power advantage at 89kW vs 74kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda HR-V is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 350mm shorter than the Honda HR-V at 4,345mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda HR-V generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 308L in the Suzuki Fronx and 339L in the Honda HR-V, giving the Honda HR-V a 31L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 11.0m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $1,539/year for the Honda HR-V. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Honda HR-V.
Estimated annual total: $1,682 (Suzuki Fronx) vs $1,539 (Honda HR-V). The Honda HR-V saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Honda HR-V). The Honda HR-V has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Honda HR-V).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Honda HR-V if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Honda HR-V takes 6 of 7 key spec categories. The Honda HR-V will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Honda HR-V has a clear edge. The Honda HR-V adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki Fronx and Honda HR-V?
The Suzuki Fronx is the cheapest at $28,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Honda HR-V by $4,410.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Honda HR-V uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki Fronx and Honda HR-V all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Honda HR-V has the largest boot at 339L.
Which can tow the most?
The Honda HR-V has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Honda HR-V has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Honda HR-V makes the most power at 89kW. The Honda HR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 9.2s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
