Suzuki Fronx vs Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Suzuki Fronx
From $28,490
SUV
Hybrid
Petrol
75.8kW
4.9 L/100km
1★ ANCAP
304L
Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
From $27,500
SUV
Hybrid
Petrol I4 + HEV
150kW
5.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
470L
Track the Suzuki Fronx & Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Fronx starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid opens at $27,500. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $990.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $30,250 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Suzuki Fronx features a 9-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Interior trim differs: the Suzuki Fronx gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Suzuki Fronx and 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 75.8kW and 137Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid responds with a Petrol I4 + HEV making 150kW and 310Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 75.8kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 335mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid at 4,330mm (2,604mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 304L in the Suzuki Fronx and 470L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 166L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 10.6m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $1,397 (Suzuki Fronx) vs $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki Fronx and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Fronx by $990.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki Fronx all hold a 1-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 470L.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid makes the most power at 150kW. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
