Suzuki Fronx vs Chery C5
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Fronx starts from $28,490 before on-road costs, while the Chery C5 opens at $29,990. That makes the Suzuki Fronx the more affordable entry point by $1,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,339 and $32,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Suzuki Fronx and Chery C5 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 48% for the Suzuki Fronx and 87% for the Chery C5.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Fronx packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Chery C5.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Fronx and 7 in the Chery C5.
Feature Showdown
The Suzuki Fronx features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Chery C5 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Fronx uses a Petrol producing 74kW and 147Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Chery C5 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.
The Chery C5 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 74kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery C5 is 3.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Fronx measures 3,995mm long on a 2,520mm wheelbase, 356mm shorter than the Chery C5 at 4,351mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery C5 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 308L in the Suzuki Fronx and 340L in the Chery C5, giving the Chery C5 a 32L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 11.2m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Suzuki Fronx and $1,967/year for the Chery C5. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $1,682 (Suzuki Fronx) vs $1,967 (Chery C5). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery C5). The Chery C5 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery C5 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery C5 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery C5 has a clear edge. The Chery C5 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
