CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Kizashi vs BMW 5 Series
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Kizashi vs BMW 5 Series

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiBMW
Price (RRP)TBC$114,900
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power131kW140kW
0-100 km/h5.6s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km6.8 L/100km
Boot Space461L520L
Towing1,700kg2,000kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Suzuki Kizashi & BMW 5 Series

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Suzuki Kizashi and BMW 5 Series hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the BMW 5 Series, against 0 on the Suzuki Kizashi.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Kizashi and 6 in the BMW 5 Series.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW 5 Series counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Suzuki Kizashi gets fabric upholstery while the BMW 5 Series offers sensatec synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Kizashi uses a 2.4L J24B petrol, DOHC 16v with variable valve timing, multipoint injection producing 131kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a FWD layout.

The BMW 5 Series responds with a Petrol making 140kW and 310Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.6 seconds.

The BMW 5 Series has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 131kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Kizashi measures 4,650mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 410mm shorter than the BMW 5 Series at 5,060mm (2,995mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW 5 Series generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 461L in the Suzuki Kizashi and 520L in the BMW 5 Series, giving the BMW 5 Series a 59L advantage.

For towing, the BMW 5 Series leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,700kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.9m

TightestSuzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 6MTTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 6MT
11.0mTighter
Best
BMW 5 Series 520i Sedan
11.9m
Worst
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 6MT
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW 5 Series 520i Sedan
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki KizashiTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki KizashiTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
BMW 5 Series11.9 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the Suzuki Kizashi and $1,938/year for the BMW 5 Series. That is a $314 annual difference in favour of the BMW 5 Series.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Kizashi) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW 5 Series). The BMW 5 Series has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Kizashi if: You or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW 5 Series if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW 5 Series takes 5 of 5 key spec categories. The BMW 5 Series will save you roughly $314 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW 5 Series has a clear edge. The BMW 5 Series adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Kizashi and BMW 5 Series?

The BMW 5 Series is the cheapest at $114,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW 5 Series uses the least fuel at 6.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Suzuki Kizashi and BMW 5 Series all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW 5 Series has the largest boot at 520L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW 5 Series has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW 5 Series has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW 5 Series makes the most power at 140kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars