CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota Yaris vs Skoda Fabia
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota Yaris vs Skoda Fabia

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaSkoda
Price (RRP)$28,990$27,990
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power85kW85kW
0-100 km/h10.2s9.7s
Fuel Economy3.5 L/100km5 L/100km
Boot Space270L380L
Towing750kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Toyota Yaris & Skoda Fabia

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Toyota Yaris starts from $28,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Fabia opens at $27,990. That makes the Skoda Fabia the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $31,889 and $30,789 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota Yaris by roughly $2,135 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota Yaris features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Fabia gets a 8.3-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Toyota Yaris stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Skoda Fabia. The Skoda Fabia counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota Yaris uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 120Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds.

The Skoda Fabia responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Fabia is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota Yaris measures 3,950mm long on a 2,550mm wheelbase, 158mm shorter than the Skoda Fabia at 4,108mm (2,564mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Fabia generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 270L in the Toyota Yaris and 380L in the Skoda Fabia, giving the Skoda Fabia a 110L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 10.7m

TightestToyota Yaris Ascent SportTightest turn at 10.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota Yaris Ascent Sport
10.2mTighter
Best
Skoda Fabia
10.7m
Worst
Toyota Yaris Ascent Sport
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Fabia
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota YarisTightest turn at 10.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota YarisTightest10.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Skoda Fabia10.7 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $998/year for the Toyota Yaris and $1,425/year for the Skoda Fabia. That is a $427 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Yaris.

Estimated annual total: $998 (Toyota Yaris) vs $1,425 (Skoda Fabia). The Toyota Yaris saves you roughly $427 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Yaris) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Fabia). The Skoda Fabia has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota Yaris if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Fabia if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Fabia takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota Yaris will save you roughly $427 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Fabia has a clear edge. The Skoda Fabia adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota Yaris and Skoda Fabia?

The Skoda Fabia is the cheapest at $27,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Yaris by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Yaris uses the least fuel at 3.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota Yaris all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Fabia has the largest boot at 380L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Fabia has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchs · Best hybrid cars · Best family cars