CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Volkswagen Passat CC vs BMW M4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volkswagen Passat CC vs BMW M4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Volkswagen Passat CC: we're still completing price, kerb weight, warranty and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecVolkswagenBMW
Price (RRP)TBC$168,700
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power220kW353kW
0-100 km/h5.6s4.2s
Fuel Economy9.7 L/100km10.1 L/100km
Boot Space532L440L
Towing1,600kg1,800kg
Warranty—5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Volkswagen Passat CC & BMW M4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW M4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats, ventilated seats, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Volkswagen Passat CC uses a 3.6-litre V6 FSI direct-injection petrol producing 220kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dsg dual-clutch automatic, 4motion all-wheel drive to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.6 seconds.

The BMW M4 responds with a Petrol making 353kW and 550Nm, paired to a manual driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.2 seconds.

The BMW M4 has the clear power advantage at 353kW vs 220kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BMW M4 is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volkswagen Passat CC measures 4,799mm long on a 2,711mm wheelbase, 2mm shorter than the BMW M4 at 4,801mm (2,857mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW M4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 532L in the Volkswagen Passat CC and 440L in the BMW M4, giving the Volkswagen Passat CC a 92L advantage.

For towing, the BMW M4 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.4m

TightestVolkswagen Passat CC Passat CC V6 FSITightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volkswagen Passat CC Passat CC V6 FSI
11.4mTighter
Best
BMW M4 Coupe Manual
11.4m
Best
Volkswagen Passat CC V6 FSI
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW M4 Coupe Manual
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolkswagen Passat CCTightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Volkswagen Passat CCTightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
BMW M411.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,765/year for the Volkswagen Passat CC and $2,879/year for the BMW M4. That is a $114 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Passat CC.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volkswagen Passat CC if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW M4 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW M4 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Volkswagen Passat CC will save you roughly $114 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Passat CC has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volkswagen Passat CC and BMW M4?

The BMW M4 is the cheapest at $168,700 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Passat CC uses the least fuel at 9.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Volkswagen Passat CC and BMW M4 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen Passat CC has the largest boot at 532L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW M4 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW M4 makes the most power at 353kW. The BMW M4 is quickest to 100km/h in 4.2s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars