CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolvo XC60 vs Toyota RAV4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volvo XC60 vs Toyota RAV4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolvoToyota
Price (RRP)$74,990$28,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power183kW107kW
0-100 km/h6.9s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km7.7 L/100km
Boot Space483L577L
Towing2,400kg800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Volvo XC60 & Toyota RAV4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Volvo XC60 starts from $74,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota RAV4 opens at $28,490. That makes the Toyota RAV4 the more affordable entry point by $46,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $82,489 and $31,339 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Volvo XC60 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Toyota RAV4. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Volvo XC60 gets leather upholstery while the Toyota RAV4 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Volvo XC60 uses a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 producing 183kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.9 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 responds with a Petrol making 107kW and 187Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The Volvo XC60 has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 107kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volvo XC60 measures 4,708mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 138mm longer than the Toyota RAV4 at 4,570mm (2,660mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo XC60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 483L in the Volvo XC60 and 577L in the Toyota RAV4, giving the Toyota RAV4 a 94L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo XC60 leads with a 2,400kg braked capacity vs 800kg. That 1,600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.0m

TightestToyota RAV4 GX 2.0 Petrol 2WD ManualTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota RAV4 GX 2.0 Petrol 2WD Manual
10.6mTighter
Best
Volvo XC60 Plus B5 Bright
11.0m
Worst
Volvo XC60 Plus B5 Bright
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota RAV4 GX 2.0 Petrol 2WD Manual
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota RAV4Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Volvo XC6011.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota RAV4Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the Volvo XC60 and $2,195/year for the Toyota RAV4. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the Volvo XC60.

Estimated annual total: $2,166 (Volvo XC60) vs $2,195 (Toyota RAV4). The Volvo XC60 saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC60) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Toyota RAV4). The Volvo XC60 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volvo XC60 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Volvo XC60 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Volvo XC60 will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota RAV4 has a clear edge. The Volvo XC60 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volvo XC60 and Toyota RAV4?

The Toyota RAV4 is the cheapest at $28,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volvo XC60 by $46,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volvo XC60 uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota RAV4 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota RAV4 has the largest boot at 577L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo XC60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,400kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Volvo XC60 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Volvo XC60 makes the most power at 183kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs