CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Everest vs Mazda CX-6e
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Everest vs Mazda CX-6e

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordMazda
Price (RRP)$59,490$53,990
Range (WLTP)484km
Battery78 kWh
Power154kW190kW
0-100 km/h10.1s
Max DC Charge194kW
10-80% Charge Time15 min
Fuel Economy7.2 L/100km
Boot Space259L363L
Towing3,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LNoYes

Price Breakdown

The Ford Everest starts from $59,490 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-6e opens at $53,990. That makes the Mazda CX-6e the more affordable entry point by $5,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,439 and $59,389 respectively.

The Mazda CX-6e qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Ford Everest, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Everest features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-6e gets a 26.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-6e counters with panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate and V2L that the Ford Everest does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Everest uses a Diesel Bi-Turbo producing 154kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.

The Mazda CX-6e responds with a Electric making 190kW and 290Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels.

The Mazda CX-6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 154kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 128mm longer than the Mazda CX-6e at 4,850mm (2,902mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 363L in the Mazda CX-6e, giving the Mazda CX-6e a 104L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1818L vs 1434L.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.8m

Mazda CX-6e GT
11.0mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m
Worst
Ford Everest
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-6e
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Everest if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-6e takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-6e has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Mazda CX-6e?

The Mazda CX-6e is the cheapest at $53,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Everest by $5,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 7.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-6e has the largest boot at 363L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-6e makes the most power at 190kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs