CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 500e vs MINI Aceman
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 500e vs MINI Aceman

Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthMINI
Price (RRP)$60,500$60,990
Range (WLTP)253km352km
Battery42 kWh54.2 kWh
Power113kW160kW
0-100 km/h7s7.1s
Max DC Charge85kW95kW
10-80% Charge Time35 min31 min
Boot Space185L300L
Warranty3yr / 150k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 500e starts from $60,500 before on-road costs, while the MINI Aceman opens at $60,990. That makes the Abarth 500e the more affordable entry point by $490.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $66,550 and $67,089 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

The MINI Aceman holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Abarth 500e.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MINI Aceman packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Abarth 500e.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Abarth 500e and 9 in the MINI Aceman.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 500e features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the MINI Aceman gets a 9.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Abarth 500e stands out with JBL audio that you will not find on the MINI Aceman. The MINI Aceman counters with panoramic roof, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 500e gets leather & alcantara upholstery while the MINI Aceman offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 500e and 2-zone in the MINI Aceman.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 500e uses a Electric producing 113kW and 235Nm of torque, sent through a single-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The MINI Aceman responds with a Electric making 160kW and 330Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.

The MINI Aceman has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 113kW. In the real-world sprint, the Abarth 500e is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 42kWh (Abarth 500e) vs 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman), giving WLTP ranges of 253km and 352km. DC fast charging peaks at 85kW (Abarth 500e) vs 95kW (MINI Aceman).

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 500e measures 3,673mm long on a 2,322mm wheelbase, 400mm shorter than the MINI Aceman at 4,073mm (2,606mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MINI Aceman generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 500e and 300L in the MINI Aceman, giving the MINI Aceman a 115L advantage. The MINI Aceman seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 10.6m

Abarth 500e Scorpionissima
9.4mTighter
Best
MINI Aceman SE Favoured
10.6m
Worst
Abarth 500e
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MINI Aceman
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 500e) vs 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman). The MINI Aceman has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 500e if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MINI Aceman if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MINI Aceman takes 8 of 10 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the MINI Aceman has a clear edge. The MINI Aceman adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 500e and MINI Aceman?

The Abarth 500e is the cheapest at $60,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MINI Aceman by $490.

Which has the longest driving range?

The MINI Aceman has the most range at 406km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The MINI Aceman accepts the highest DC charging at up to 95kW.

Which is safest?

The MINI Aceman has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The MINI Aceman has the largest boot at 300L.

Which has the best warranty?

The MINI Aceman has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MINI Aceman makes the most power at 160kW. The Abarth 500e is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · All SUVs