CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-70 vs Jeep Wrangler
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-70 vs Jeep Wrangler

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaJeep
Price (RRP)$76,720$81,990
Power254kW200kW
0-100 km/h9.3s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km10.2 L/100km
Boot Space598L365L
Towing2,500kg1,497kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-70 starts from $76,720 before on-road costs, while the Jeep Wrangler opens at $81,990. That makes the Mazda CX-70 the more affordable entry point by $5,270.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,392 and $90,189 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-70 by roughly $2,990 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-70 and Jeep Wrangler hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-70 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Jeep Wrangler.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mazda CX-70 and 6 in the Jeep Wrangler. The Mazda CX-70 adds a 360-degree camera that the Jeep Wrangler misses.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda CX-70 stands out with head-up display that you will not find on the Jeep Wrangler. The Jeep Wrangler counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, Alpine audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-70 uses a Petrol producing 254kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout.

The Jeep Wrangler responds with a Petrol I4 Turbo making 200kW and 400Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.3 seconds.

The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 200kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-70 measures 5,120mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 786mm longer than the Jeep Wrangler at 4,334mm (2,459mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 598L in the Mazda CX-70 and 365L in the Jeep Wrangler, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 233L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2015L vs 2050L. The Mazda CX-70 seats 5 vs 4.

For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,497kg. That 1,003kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 11.8m

Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 2-Door
10.0mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m
Worst
Mazda CX-70
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Jeep Wrangler
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70 and $2,907/year for the Jeep Wrangler. That is a $598 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-70.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Mazda CX-70) vs $2,907 (Jeep Wrangler). The Mazda CX-70 saves you roughly $598 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70) vs 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Wrangler). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Jeep Wrangler).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Jeep Wrangler if: You or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-70 takes 5 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-70 will save you roughly $598 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-70 and Jeep Wrangler?

The Mazda CX-70 is the cheapest at $76,720 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Jeep Wrangler by $5,270.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-70 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-70 and Jeep Wrangler all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs